Showing posts with label Johnny Depp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Johnny Depp. Show all posts

Johnny Depp Wallpapers Pics,Alice in Wonderland,Pirates Movies Pictures

Johnny Depp is a American Actor has given many hollywood blockbusters and hit movies like Alice in Wonderland and Pirates Movies. Pictures and movies of Johnny Depp can be downloaded free from our site which are recent photos wallpapers for your windows 7 and Android phones.


Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Celebrity First Cars! My First Car Story

Uploaded by: ScreenTeamShow

Description: CONTEST! Share your "#MyFirstCar" stories on Twitter with the hashtag #myfirstcar, or submit your stories at MyFirstCarStories.com for the chance to win a trip to London to see the Top Gear Live Experience! www.myfirstcarstories.com

The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus (2009)


Title: The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus (2009)

Director: Terry Gilliam

Cast: Heath Ledger, Johnny Depp, Jude Law, Collin Farrell, Christopher Plummer, Andrew Garfield, Lily Cole, Verne Troyer

Review:

When we watch a movie, most of the time we filter, interpret, and syphon it through the experiences we have lived through during the course of our own lives. We don't ever just "watch" a movie, we see it through our own lives. We give whatever meaning we want to the characters and situations we are watching, usually those meanings or interpretations are a mirror of ourselves. This is one of the main themes that Terry Gilliam's new film, The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus plays with. Our imaginations represent us. They are like a calling card to who we are inside. Heavy stuff, considering Gilliam usually gives a very light tone to most of his films. But its obvious that Terry Gilliam is a man who is not happy with the way things are being run in the world, he has always, through most of his body of work retained an anti-system mentality towards things. This hate towards "the system" can be seen through the frustration of his characters with the way things are established. In Brazil, the main character cant deal with the fact that his life is so redundant and boring, so he escapes to another world where he is a hero. In 12 Monkeys, the government is using Bruce Willis to investigate our past, but really, they don't know what the hell they are doing, or even if they are doing it right. In Gilliam's films, this hate for the way things are, this hatred for the reality of things is being fought not with swords or guns, but with our imaginations.


Started out kind of heavy there with my review. But this was the latest Terry Gilliam film, and I am a huge Gilliam fan. So just keep in mind, this review comes from someone who loves and admires Gilliam's films a great deal. I have always admired how Gilliam escapes to these fantastical wonderful worlds. In many ways, Gilliam escapes from reality through his films, but at the same time, since we are talking about art here, Gilliam addresses certain issues, he needs to express. Like any good director, Gilliam criticizes and satirizes society through his movies. And in my opinion, society and the way things are deserve it. Screw it, what can I say? I agree with the guy. Things are fucked up. Gilliam is saying through his films that things are so messed up, so depressing that we need to escape to another imaginary world to be alright. Isn't that what films are all about? The "great escape"? And what better way to escape, then with this new Terry Gilliam film? What can I say about The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus? Well, that its a Gilliam film through and through. This isn't Gilliam restrained by corporate douche bags like in The Brothers Grimm, nope this is Gilliam once again cutting loose, still trying to amaze and wow us, and still commenting on the world we live in. With a touch of insanity and zaniness for good measure.


The film is about a traveling theater group. These guys go around town doing their little show, presenting "The Great Dr. Parnassus". They offer you great and wondrous things but only if you walk through the mirror to see it. Thing is, Dr. Parnassus is going around collecting souls, once they enter his mirror, they re-emerge happy and full of life. With new energies to face the darkness of the world. You know, the same way movies do. Anyways, Dr. Parnassus played by Christopher Plummer is an aging man, who just so happens to be immortal. He sold his daughter to the devil for said immortality. The deal being that when she turned 16 she would immediately become The Devils property. Of course, now that his daughter Valentina is 16, Dr. Parnassus wants nothing to do with that deal and is looking for away to break with it. Oh by the way, the devil is played with exquisiteness by the one and only Tom Waits. So anyhow, Parnassus is on the run. He goes around doing his little show, living in poverty with his daughter and theater group. In comes Heath Ledgers character, Tony. A man trying to forget who he once was and escaping his reality as well. He joins the theater group and helps them run the circus. Will the devil get his due? Will Parnassus escape the clutches of the devil and retain his daughter? And will Tony ever remember who he once was?


Speaking of Heath Ledger, I thought that he was going to be in the film a lot less, but apparently, he had filmed a lot! He of course, did a great job of portraying the two faced main character, Tony. The liar who enters the theater groups life, by playing an amnesiac. I always admired Ledger for wanting to back up Terry Gilliam as a director. Its quite obvious Ledger connected wit Terry Gilliam's artistic genius and decided to participate in this film. Same reason I respect Johnny Depp for doing the same, for being on Gilliam's films as if saying "this guy is great! Come see his films!" Johnny Depp's participation on this film is brief, but much appreciated in my book. Same goes for Jude Law, who has one of the coolest scenes in the movie, where he is going up these extremely long ladders that reached all the way to the clouds. Collin Farell did the best of the three. Farell actually acted as if he was Heath Ledger. Of the three invited actors who were chosen to fill in the gaps that Ledgers unfortunate departure inflicted upon this film, Farell was the one who embodied Ledger the best. Right down to his mannerisms and facial gestures. Lily Cole as Valentina -Dr. Parnassus's daughter- was a great casting choice on Gilliam's part. She has a strange kind of beauty. Like Christina Ricci, but even more otherworldly. Its an odd kind of beauty, but fits quite perfectly in a movie like this one. Cole looks like she would fit quite well in any fantasy film that would feature fairies or elves. She sure wasn't hard to look at thats for sure.

Speaking about the films themes I can say that it addresses many. I for one really thought that Gilliam was talking a lot about being Terry Gilliam. An aging director, and old fantasist whom nobody cares about anymore. Gilliam sees himself as the aging Parnassus, trying to bring his creaky old theater and stories to the people for their enjoyment. He wants audiences to transport themselves into his mirror worlds. His films. I of course am not one of those who doesn't care for Gilliam's films, I love them and welcome each one like a gift from the fantasy movie gods. I have always given Terry Gilliam props for being such an escape artist. He really loves to dive deep into that world we call "imagination", often bringing back the biggest and fattest imaginary fish in the pond. On this film, every time we go into Dr. Parnassus's magic mirror, every trip is different. You see, the world you find inside the mirror will reflect your own imagination, the things you like, the things you fear. I thought it was a wonderful allegory for how films mirror society, and how we should see ourselves in them. The film tries to shows us how we can see what we need to change about ourselves and the world we live in through films. How films both entertain and enlighten us. I think it was a great idea for Gilliam to work with Charles McKeown on this films script. McKeown has been actively working on fantasy films for some years now. He was responsible for writing The Adventures of Baron Munchausen and Brazil, both two of Gilliam's best films. Knowing that the writer of Baron Munchausen wrote this film makes perfect sense because The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus has many things in common with Munchausen. But more on that later. This paring of two great fantasist in one film, rejoining forces once again was a match made in heaven.


The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus is a film that speaks about the whole process of making a film. Yes my friends, this is yet another film about making films. And it comes as no surprise that Gilliam should want to address this subject matter. After all, he has been making complex and artistic films through out his whole life. Why shouldn't he make a film that summarizes everything he has learned through out the course of his directorial career? So in essence, Parnassus, is Gilliam. He wants to entertain us with his magic theater show. But what happens? People just aren't that interested anymore. They want something hip, something new, something edgy. And Gilliam even addresses this as well. The keeping up with the technology and the audiences ever changing interests. What should we sacrifice for our art, and for the pleasing of the audience? Tony, the "liar" looked to me like he was the young producer trying to present Gilliam to a new generation of audiences. Trying to update Gilliam's style and true nature.


In this film, Gilliam takes a stab at using computer generated images once again, same as he did in The Brothers Grimm. Gilliam has always been an "old school" filmmaker. He prefers to use mate paintings and miniatures to conjure up his fantasy worlds. Its been interesting to see Gilliam accept and use the tools of modern filmmaking on his films. Gilliam, very reluctantly has begun using CGI on his films. My own personal take on things is, I prefer the old Gilliam, with his miniatures and his paintings. But such is the modern world of films, computers have taken over. Gilliam has realized this and has decided to adapt. In The Brothers Grimm (the only Terry Gilliam film I can honestly say I dont love) the CGI was a complete disaster in my book. It brought the movie down because it wasn't beautiful. It wasn't even good. The CGI imagery in that particular Gilliam flick didn't work for me. Dr. Parnassus is Gilliams second attempt at using this new tool to tell his tale. I have to say that I see a great improvement. We get to see Gilliam's giant brooding castles, reminiscent of those we saw on Time Bandits. But in some of the imaginary worlds, the computer animation isn't all that great. Its on and off, I wouldn't say the effects were perfect. They were pretty to look at, but sometimes not all that realistic. They go more into the cartoonish side of things. More like something Gilliam might have cooked up during his animation days with the Monty Python group, but hey, its not bad for the kind of film were in, where we are going deep into the imagination, where anything can happen.

Hey, look! And old fantasist, a little girl and a theater group! Is it Imaginarium? Nope, its The Adventures of Baron Munchausen!

The only criticism I have for the film, and its not really that big of a deal is that the film is very similar in plot and situations to Gilliam's The Adventures of Baron Munchausen. Here are the similarities:

- The film centers around the theater group, the actors and what happens behind stage - This is something we see in many of Gilliam's films. The hassle and the franticness of the world behind the stage. It is featured most prominently in Baron Munchausen.

- The film is centered around a little girl as the main character - Again, something Gilliam loves to do. We saw it Tideland, Baron Munchausen and now in Dr. Parnassus.
- The little girl is always pushing the old man not to give up the fight - In Baron Munchausen, the little girl is always pushing Munchausen not to fall asleep, not to give up, to continue the fight, the journey till the very end. Same happens here with Dr. Parnassus and his daughter Valentine.

- The old fantasist tells a tale, and the audience is pulled into it with him

- An evil character dressed in black follows the main character around. In Munchausen it was death, in Parnassus it was Tom Waits as TheDevil.


Those Terry Gilliam fans out there will notice the similarities with that film. But, same as Tideland, this new Terry Gilliam film has a darker side to it. Theres not so much comedy to the film, its bleaker. Darker. Again, the film mirrors its artist, so Terry Gilliam is a dark soul, who doesn't want to let go of that childlike wonderment he gets from fantasy and the use of his imagination. But I miss that time when Gilliam would put a lot of humor into his fantasy tales. But I guess we all change, we seldom stay the same. We evolve, and more often then not, when we grow and learn about the way things really are, we become just a little darker and sadder inside. The world can be a dark place, with dark experiences, but it can also hold great beauty. it all depends on how you look at things.

Rating: 4 out of 5

The ultimate fantasist himself, Terry Gilliam taking a break in between scenes

The Imaginarium of Doctor ParnassusThe Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus [Blu-ray]The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (20th Anniversary Edition)The Adventures of Baron Munchausen [Blu-ray]Tideland (Two-Disc Collector's Edition)

Lost in La Mancha (2002)


Title: Lost in La Mancha (2002)

Director: Keith Fulton, Louis Pepe

Cast: Johnny Depp, Terry Gilliam, Jean Rochefort

Review:

Terry Gilliam's one of my favorite directors, but its no secret that when he decides to make a movie its always an uphill battle. Brazil had a heck of a time getting out to the public because of the studios little faith in the film, they thought it was too weird and that audiences would have a hard time "getting it". To their disdain, the film went out to become a critical hit, won numerous awards all across and earned a couple of academy award nominations as well. Adventures of Baron Munchausen, was a critical hit but a box office disappointment. The studio that financed the film was going through some "new management" problems and the film wasn't really exposed to the public. A fiasco that Gilliam never really recovered from. After Munchausen its gotten harder and harder for Gilliam to make a picture. But the guy is as resilient as a cockroach and he keeps coming back with another film, and another. Some have been box office succeses (12 Monkeys, The Fisher King) and others have not (The Brothers Grimm, Tideland) but he has always kept going. Recently he directed the excellent Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus, which in itself was plagued by unfortunate tragedy as well, with the untimely death of Heath Ledger. Still, he managed to finish the film. Theres Gilliam for you, nothing stops him from getting his film made! But there was this one time when a film actually kicked Terry Gilliams ass and sent him home to mama. This is the documentary that captured the tragedy.

Everything looks fine and dandy at this meeting dont it?

The Man Who Killed Quixote had always been a project that was on Gilliams slate of  future projects. When you think about it, this film and subject matter are perfect for Gilliam to handle. An old man trying to escape the ugly realities of this world by mentally escaping to his fantasy world where he can beat evil is certainly a familiar theme for Gilliam. A few of Gilliams films showcase his fascination with this theme. For example we have The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, Brazil, and most recently, The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus. But getting The Man Who Killed Quixote off the ground was not going to be easy. Getting funding from hollywood would prove next to imposible, after the Baron Munchausen debacle. So Gilliam did what any sensible director would do when he is desperate for funding. He went overseas for it! So Gilliam decides to make The Man Who Killed Quixote by shooting it in Spain with European funding. Was this new independent project as hard to make as his previous films?


The simple answer is yes. Yes it was harder. Much harder! This documentary chronicles the whole process of this movies downfall. And I say downfall cause the movie hit so many mishaps and problems along the way that it never got finished. It was simply abandoned by everyone, even by its director who simply couldn't handle making a movie under those conditions. Its frustrating to see a director like Gilliam saying "I don't want to make a film like this", "Im getting very nervous, very nervous" I have to hand it to the guys who made this documentary, they really captured something we movie buffs hardly ever get to watch. The birth and death of a failed project. We get to see from day one when Gilliam arrives to Spain, speaking with the producers, visiting the sets that were built, doing his storyboards, we literally get to see Gilliam in his element, coming up with ideas, giving suggestions, excited and giddy to make his dream movie. And for a while, it appears that all is well, he managed to gather a little more then 31 million dollars to make his movie and now here he is just a few months away from filming. I thought it was a real treat to see Gilliam in this whole process. There are moments when you can see Gilliams smile, his eyes shinning. The whole pre-production process actually has a light hearted happy tone to it. But soon, darkness descended upon this project.


Number one, actors had not really rehearsed certain scenes they were supposed to, as a result, we see Gilliam getting pissed and screaming "Fuck!" and "I want to know if were going to be fucked before hand!" with real anger in his voice. We see the assistant director getting heat for not having things running smoothly as they should be. Spanish actor Jean Rochefort who had the all too important role of Don Quixote getting back problems when his horse riding scenes came along. And that was one of the main problems with the production, its main star got sick. I couldn't really blame him cause the guy was something like 70 years old and he was spending hours upon hours on a horse waiting to shoot his scenes. He held it like a champ for sometime till it was clearly visible that the guy was in excruciating pain, so away he went to his doctors, the main star of the film gone, and that's when the movie really begins to fall apart. The main actor never returns to the film! To make things worse, calamity really struck this jinxed project and a huge storm began to erupt during the filming of some scenes in the desert. Sets and props and equipment were totally lost in the floods created by the storm! So sad to see all that film equipment being destroyed by the floods.

The look on their faces says it all

It was tragedy upon tragedy on this movie. And its all here documented for us to see. I mean painful and sad as this whole thing was, I think there's something positive in the whole thing. It's a document for all those aspiring filmmakers out there that shows exactly how NOT to make a movie. It was really a disaster, there was no communication, no true preparation, things weren't thought off before hand. I mean it was just an awful experience! Any aspiring filmmaker or director will look at this and learn a lot about what should not happen during a production. I'm sure they show this film in film schools all across the country, and they should. It's a great film to learn from. Kind of tough to watch everyones sad faces, everyone is sort of in this desperation mode. By the end of the documentary its crazy to see Gilliam saying "How do we pull the plug on this thing?"

I hate the fact that The Man Who Killed Quixote never saw the light of day. I mean from certain screen tests that we get to see on the documentary, it seemed to me like The Man Who Killed Quixote could've been another diamond in Gilliam's resume. The actor Jean Rochefort, the man who would be Quixote was perfect for the role, he looked the part to perfection and his Spanish accent made things all the better. Too bad he didnt have the stamina to go through with it all the way to the end. Johnny Depp is a champ. He arrived, with the best intentions, completely commited to making this film. He always looks at Gilliam as if saying "Im here till you pull the plug man, just tell me what to do!" Johnny Depp actually shot some of his scenes and you can see in the few scenes that got shot that this was going to be a good role for him as well. He was playing a man from the present who gets to time travel to Quixote's time and Quixote takes him as his Sancho Panza, his sidekick. Anyhows, what little we get to see of the would be film, looked awesome.

Depp fights with a fish in one scene

 But we have to remember, good old Terry Gilliam never gives up. He never surrenders. Gilliam has his mind really set on making this film at some point in his life. And it looks like he finally is. Last I heard, Robert Duval was attached to playing Don Quixote, with Johnny Depp still on board to play the Sancho Panza character.  In the mean time we get this documentary to hold us off. Excellent viewing material for movie buffs, future filmmakers and Gilliam fans in general.

Rating: 5 out of 5


Lost in La Mancha

Johnny Depp Sexiest Man Alive (People)

Its that time of year again, when People magazine gives out the award for sexiest man alive!

And the winner should come as no surprise, as captain cool himself, Johnny Depp took the prize.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...